It is the one of the fundamental duties of the government to
offer quality healthcare to its civilians. There has always been a debate about
whether free governmental health care should be preferred over private
healthcare. My opinion is that governmental facilities are always required but
there should be no restriction on private health care.
Private health care provide competitive and qualitative
medical services to the people. Here, highly qualified professionals are hired
to work for the community to ensure a certain enhanced quality of services offered.
Moreover, private sector units are profit making organisations that invest a
good proportion of their profits in acquiring latest technology and research.
This is highly beneficial to the patients in the long run. Finally, private
companies offer better facilities like 24-hour emergency services, ambulance
networks, highly quality and super speciality hospitals and so on. Though, on
the flip side, some private hospitals sometimes overcharge their patients to
maximize profits.
On the other hand, governments run health care offers cost
effectiveness and better accessibility. It is available in smallest of towns
and villages of the country, where under-privileged people are benefitted by
it. In addition, governments can get donations and allocate funds to offer free
healthcare to the civilians. However, it is often observed that public
healthcare centres may not offer satisfactory services primarily because of the
huge cost of free health care. Lastly, it is also seen, at times, that
promptness and professionalism in healthcare services and absent in government
run facilities.
Finally, it is evident that both systems of offering health
care have their own benefits and drawbacks and yet both are required in present
day societies. Hence, I opine that private health care should not be
eliminated.
No comments:
Post a Comment