Technology in the present day world has revolutionized
services and facilities in almost all facets of life. Public libraries have
also benefited to a great extent by the use of computers. Some people have also
benefited to a great extent by the use of computers. Some people present an
argument that governments should not spend money in maintaining them as
computers can replace them. However, this suggestion does not seem feasible
enough for most countries.
There are many reasons why computers cannot completely
replace public libraries in the near future. First, libraries contain books written
in many different languages whereas
majority of software programs are developed in English which creates
problems for the programmer in displaying information regarding such books
efficiently. Secondly, it is indeed difficult to read books on computers as it
has implications for the health of our eyes. In addition, it is expensive
because computers need infrastructure which may not be affordable in the rural
areas of developing economies.
Thirdly, not all the people who visit a library may be
computer savvy. Thus, it is extremely difficult for many members of public
libraries to access the services and to get benefits from it. Finally,
computers are also vulnerable to technical glitches. They do succumb to system
crashes, viruses, hardware or software related problems and in such a situation
it shall become next to impossible to access any book in the library.
However, according to some people computers do have benefits
to offer. One of them is, they save time and they need less space. We can store
thousands of books in a small 3.5 inch hard drive. Also, life of books is
longer in digital form compared to their versions on paper. Most importantly,
with the help of computers, books of the library can be accessed by people beyond geographical borders.
Finally, considering the points on the either side of the
given topic, I conclude that computers should be used to facilitate library
functioning but in the near future they should not completely replace the
public libraries.
No comments:
Post a Comment